Still More Potential Than Performance, By: M.D. Roblyer and Mike Cass

Virtual Reality Research in Special Education: May 1991 Volume 28 Number 8

In this article Roblyer and Cass discuss the various trials that were completed using virtual reality (VR) in comparison with people ranging in ages from 19-38 which each had different special needs. A case that I thought was interesting was the case in which they used VR as a learning tool for children with autism. There were 5 issues in which autistic children were found to struggle with, and these same 5 factors in which VR was capable in assisting with: sensory problems, lack of generalization, visual thought patterns, individualized treatment, and responsiveness to computer technology. Although the VR was definitely a benefit, it was said to still be in the early developmental stage and attention was also needed in a few other areas. VR seems as though it could have great potential, and I look forward to hearing more success stories in the future!

(Q1): How accurate do you think the VR simulators are?

(A1): I think that over time, after more studies are done, the information might be more accurate. From reading the article it seemed as though they noticed that people became more comfortable with the VR over time, therefore their accuracy or progress improved after much repetitiveness.


(Q2): How is the VR simulator beneficial? How can they be improved?

(A2): I see VR as a definite advantage, but with advancing technology I believe there is always room for improvement. With more studies, and realistic measurements the VR could become more productive. Knowing what each person needs to simulate that part that the brain is lacking is also a very important factor in determining how to use the VR simulators.